arXiv:2604.25716v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Safety mechanisms for large language models (LLMs) remain predominantly English-centric, creating systematic vulnerabilities in multilingual deployment. Prior work shows that translating malicious prompts into other languages can substantially increase jailbreak success rates, exposing a structural cross-lingual security gap. We investigate whether such attacks can be mitigated through language-agnostic semantic similarity without retraining or language-specific adaptation. Our approach compares multilingual query embeddings against a fixed English codebook of jailbreak prompts, operating as a training-free external guardrail for black-box LLMs. We conduct a systematic evaluation across four languages, two translation pipelines, four safety benchmarks, three embedding models, and three target LLMs (Qwen, Llama, GPT-3.5). Our results reveal two distinct regimes of cross-lingual transfer. On curated benchmarks containing canonical jailbreak templates, semantic similarity generalizes reliably across languages, achieving near-perfect separability (AUC up to 0.99) and substantial reductions in absolute attack success rates under strict low-false-positive constraints. However, under distribution shift – on behaviorally diverse and heterogeneous unsafe benchmarks – separability degrades markedly (AUC $approx$ 0.60-0.70), and recall in the security-critical low-FPR regime drops across all embedding models.
Behavior change beyond intervention: an activity-theoretical perspective on human-centered design of personal health technology
IntroductionModern personal technologies, such as smartphone apps with artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, have a significant potential for helping people make necessary changes in their behavior


