arXiv:2604.26157v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Structural generalization in semantic parsing requires systems to apply learned compositional rules to novel structural combinations. Existing approaches either rely on hand-written algebraic rules (AM-Parser) or fail to generalize structurally (Transformer-based models). We present an alternative requiring no hand-written compositional rules, based on a neural cellular automaton (NCA) with a discrete bottleneck: all compositional rules are learned from data through local iteration. On the SLOG benchmark, the system achieves 100% type-exact match on 11 of 17 structural generalization categories, including three where AM-Parser scores 0 to 74%, with an overall standard deviation of 0.2 across 10 seeds (vs. AM-Parser’s 4.3). Analysis reveals that all 5,539 failure instances reduce to exactly two mechanisms: novel combinations of wh-extraction context with reduced verb types, and modifiers appearing on the subject side of verbs.When we decompose results by CCG structural features, each sub-pattern either succeeds on all instances or fails on all. Intermediate scores (e.g., 41.4%) are mixtures of structurally distinct CCG patterns, not partial generalization.All failures correspond to directed operations absent from training; all successes correspond to operations already covered.
Disclosure in the era of generative artificial intelligence
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become embedded in academic writing, assisting with tasks ranging from language editing to drafting text and producing evidence. Despite



