arXiv:2605.18781v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Can LLMs simulate how humans form and change beliefs in social networks? We put this to the test by replicating an established study on belief dynamics, evaluating 12 LLMs across multiple model families and parameter sizes. The answer is a clear no, and in systematic ways. LLMs fail to capture initial human belief distributions and tend to be overall more conformist than humans, shifting their responses to align with those around them. They also take a nuanced approach to emulating human homophilic tendencies within networks. Our findings carry a double payoff: they highlight fundamental properties of LLM behavior, and they raise a sharp warning against deploying LLMs as human proxies in social simulations.
Explainable AI in kidney stone detection and segmentation: a mini review
Kidney stones are one of the most common renal disorders that can produce severe complications if not diagnosed and treated early. Recently, advances in AI