arXiv:2604.22890v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Background:Adverse reproductive history is a multisystemic risk factor, but evidence is constrained by isolated outcome studies, limited adjustment, and non-interpretable algorithmic models. We re-frame the estimand from prediction to concurrent risk classification and emphasize calibration, interpretability, and systematic error. Methods:We analyzed 1,602 U.S. women aged 20-44 years from NHANES 2017-March 2020 with reproductive-history variables, chronic-condition indicators, and PHQ-9 data. Restricted multimorbidity was defined as at least two of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and kidney stones. Features were summarized using principal components analysis and k-means clustering. We compared multivariable logistic regression with XGBoost and used SHAP values to quantify contributions. Results:Early multimorbidity occurred in 6.6% (106/1,602); 71.0% had no chronic condition and 22.4% had one. Adverse reproductive burden was common: 58% had at least one adverse reproductive factor and 12.6% had three or more. Four latent phenotypes emerged (n=398, 508, 102, 594), including a fragile subgroup in which 77.5% met the multimorbidity definition. In holdout evaluation, XGBoost improved discrimination relative to logistic regression (ROC-AUC 0.766 vs 0.667), but showed worse probability accuracy and calibration (Brier 0.069 vs 0.059; expected calibration error 0.113 vs 0.037). Dominant drivers were age, PHQ-9 score, income-to-poverty ratio, race/ethnicity, education, and the adverse reproductive index. Conclusions: Principal components analysis and k-means phenotyping revealed that adverse reproductive life-course structure is strongly clustered with concurrent early multimorbidity in U.S. women aged 20-44 years. Although XGBoost improved discrimination, calibration and feature attribution remained essential for reliable translation into practice
Disclosure in the era of generative artificial intelligence
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become embedded in academic writing, assisting with tasks ranging from language editing to drafting text and producing evidence. Despite

