arXiv:2512.20162v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We compare human and large language model (LLM) generalization in the number game, a concept inference task. Using a Bayesian model as an analytical framework, we examined the inductive biases and inference strategies of humans and LLMs. The Bayesian model captured human behavior better than LLMs in that humans flexibly infer rule-based and similarity-based concepts, whereas LLMs rely more on mathematical rules. Humans also demonstrated a few-shot generalization, even from a single example, while LLMs required more samples to generalize. These contrasts highlight the fundamental differences in how humans and LLMs infer and generalize mathematical concepts.
Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions for Weight Management Among Adults With Excess Body Weight: Scoping Review
Background: Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) use real-time monitoring to deliver personalized support at optimal moments, demonstrating potential for improving lifestyle behaviors in weight management. Objective:




