arXiv:2605.17186v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Countably infinite systems of linear ODEs arise as forward equations for many continuous-time Markov processes. The standard recipe — truncate to a finite cap N and exponentiate — pays cubic cost in N and a time-growing boundary-feedback bias. We identify a structural condition on the rates, L_n+r,n = alpha_r n + beta_r (“linear-rate”), under which the generating function G(z,t) = sum_n x_n(t) z^n satisfies a first-order linear PDE in z, and the method of characteristics yields a composition-multiplier representation G(z,t) = K_t(z) G(Phi_t(z), 0). The Taylor coefficients of Phi_t and K_t on any output window 0,…,N are determined exactly by a closed lower-triangular polynomial ODE on R^2(N+1), independent of any coefficients above N. Truncation enters only through the support M_0 of the initial law, set independently of N. For binary birth-death the closure collapses to the geometric tail p_n(t) = p_1(t) rho(t)^n-1 with rho(t) = lambda(1 – e^-(mu-lambda)t)/(mu – lambda e^-(mu-lambda)t). The linear-rate class spans Markov branching with immigration, multi-type branching, matrix-valued telegraph and G/R elongation, and signed or non-stochastic hierarchies. When the generator decomposes as L = A + B with A linear-rate and B non-affine (Schlogl bistable, predator-prey, lattice reaction-diffusion), we pair the closure with Strang splitting on B; Richardson extrapolation lifts the time order to Delta-t^4 at ~3x wall clock. On the Schlogl problem at V=500, N=8,000, the split runs 6.3x faster than dense Pade and 20x faster than sparse Krylov expv. For the stationary regime, a closure-Strang power iteration extends the same machinery to multi-dimensional product-state-space generators where sparse LU hits OOM/OOT or boundary-projection bias at usable caps. Numerical experiments locate where each route wins and where it is dominated by standard tools.
Learning to lead in a hybrid human-AI enterprise
As adoption of AI agents looks set to surge by as much as 300% in the next two years, leadership teams are carefully considering the implications
