arXiv:2606.07325v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We study the minimax rate of estimating a future value $mu_t_n+h$ of a curve $tmapstomu_t$ in the $2$-Wasserstein space $mathcalP_2(mathbbR^d)$ from finitely many noisy snapshots of its past, under an adiabatic bound $|nabla_t^k v|levarepsilon$ on the $k$-th covariant derivative of the velocity field. Our central result is a unified temporal-spatial minimax lower bound: over regular, locally transport-rich subclasses, every estimator incurs $W_2$-risk with $M$-exponent $gamma_d(k+1)/(k+1+gamma_d)$, $gamma_d=min(1/d,1/2)$ ($M$ the total sample size). It follows from a temporal-to-spatial reduction: the smoothness budget defines a reachable $W_2$-ball into which a transport packing is embedded along the time axis, and the information of the entire snapshot experiment is controlled by a Fano argument — the spatial packing is classical, but its smoothness-admissible temporal embedding and the full-window analysis are new. The bound interpolates a dimension-free extrapolation floor of order $varepsilon h^k+1$ — the irreducible cost of an unobserved future, present even with the exact past — and the spatial estimation curse $M^-gamma_d$, recovering the static distribution-estimation rate as $ktoinfty$. We state the lower bound in a design-dependent form — with a design-weighted effective sample size — valid for arbitrary observation times, and obtain the closed-form exponent in the dense (equispaced) regime. The matching upper bound is established at $k=0$ (rate $M^-1/(d+1)$, $dge3$) and, in a translation submodel, for all $k$; for $kge1$ a covariant estimator attains the rate conditionally on two estimates (a comparison-geometry bias bound and an optimal-transport map-estimation rate), leaving the unconditional general-$k$ upper bound as an open problem. Numerical experiments on synthetic curved and flat families corroborate the predicted exponents.
Digital health tools and point solutions—pitfalls in population health program measurement
Digital health tools are generally poorly regulated and often lack strong research evidence, posing challenges for purchasers of point solutions such as employer groups and